• IN-HOUSE •
Website Design  •  User Testing  •  Web Development

UX
Improvements

Upgrading the Procurify website global navigation from a simple dropdown to a full mega menu style, to improve the overall user experience, increase page findability and user journey, and improve SEO efforts.

Overview

My Role

  • Project Lead
  • Web Designer
  • Conducting User Testing
  • Creative Direction
  • Low Code Development

Tools

  • Figma
  • Webflow
  • InVision
  • UsabilityHub

Collaboration

This project includes several rounds of team feedback, external user testing / feedback and Internal team feedback.

  • Internal feedback gathered from:
    • Marketing (including Marketing leadership team)
    • Growth team
    • Individuals from multiple departments (Sales, IT, Finance, RevOps, CX, Product Design)
  • Managing Editor of Communications - copywriting

Original Challenges

The original website navigation was a simple dropdown navigation with ambiguous one word headers, requiring the user to decipher and search around the website looking for important information.

Objectives

The core objectives of this project was to:
  • Increase web user experience making key pages accessible
  • Reduce website bounce rates
  • Increase page views
  • Improve SEO, by making key pages 3-clicks or less from the homepage
  • Allowing the navigation and book a demo CTA to be available anywhere on the site using a fixed position
  • Add context to each link
  • Highlight new and valuable pages / resources

Considerations

  • Considering how this might function on mobile - especially an anchored demo CTA button
  • Mouse hover - primary tab entry and exit delays to avoid frustration, vs clicks
  • Accessibility of small + colour in nav menu
  • Cognitive overload moving from a simple dropdown to a mega menu
  • Use of descriptive labels and blurbs

Research Resources

Some of the resources I used throughout my discovery:
  • Different navigation styles: Case Study - The Ideal Navigation Menu READ ↪
  • Different navigation styles: Mega Menus Work Well for Site Navigation READ ↪
  • Hover delays and timings: Timing Guideline for Exposing Hidden Content READ ↪
  • Cognitive overload: Harvard Business Review - More Isn't Always Better READ ↪

process

The Original Navigation

Discovery

During a web project, I will always kick things off with a discovery which often involves understanding the goals and challenges of a project, competitor analysis, and comparable research (often focused on SasS tech space). From here, I'll look at the examples and pin point areas that might create inspiration, highlight elements that might be important to incorporate in the design, or elements that might be irrelevant or critiqued.

For this particular project, I also did a deep dive of the site map and site structure, as well as research on different web navigation structures to identify which solution might fit best for our requirements.

Phase 1 - Collecting Feedback

WIREFRAMING  •  TEAM FEEDBACK  •  JOURNEY TESTING

Feedback Sessions

After completing the discovery phase, I then took all that information and inspiration that I had sourced and worked that into a v1 wireframe, where I was able to focus on the overall structure of the nav, and which pages should be highlighted within the primary and secondary navigation.

These wireframes were then presented to the Marketing and Growth Teams using the InVision platform to collect direct feedback.

Company Tab Adjustments

  • There was debated within the team if the Company tab should be housed within the main website navigation
  • Moved all of the pages within the “CONNECT” category to the Resources tab
  • Partnerships moved to the Product tab, as a selling page.
  • Spend Culture was removed from the company tab and shifted to the Resources Tab

Internal UX Journey Testing

I then set out to conduct some unmoderated user testing from my peers, to get a clearer understanding and consensus on where people might expect to find certain pages with the mega menu navigation. The participants that were chosen were from a broad demographic, ensuring that this test was inclusive of many different people - from a range in age, roles, departments and tech experience levels.

The questions that were used in this test were built to be customer-centric and were taken from a previous research document that I had worked on with our SDRs, which outlined key questions that users may ask when landing on our website. Some task related questions were also added to get feedback specifically on the location of some examples.

SEE TESTING QUESTIONS & LEARNINGS

PHASE 1
KEY LEARNINGS

There were certain areas within our navigation that needed further research to understand and validate feedback and opinions towards components in question and their value, for example:

1.

Displaying the company phone number - questions were raised if this should be within the top navigation, and if we receive enough calls for this to be a critical component of the top nav.

Results: After researching further on the number of calls that we receive, and the overall user experience of the call journey, it was decide to remove this component from a key position, and instead include within the menu dropdown.

2.

Company tab - there was some internal debate to whether the Company tab should be within the top navigation, or whether the top navigation should only be buyer-centric and should only contain tabs that help a buyer.

Results: This required some further testing and data to support this notion. The Company tab was then removed from phase 2 testing, with an additional section at the end centred around questions to provide more information on what a user looks for when researching a SaaS product, and if a company tab is relevant.

3.

Login button - there was also some debate on whether the Login button should be included in the main nav, and instead be moved to the footer. This being for the same reason, to ensure the navigation was only focused on being buyer-centric.

Results: Further research was done to identify whether the Login button is a critical pathway for our customers, and to gain an understanding of how many customers would be expected to change their behaviour if the Login button was to be repositioned within the footer. On average 30% of our overall web traffic were customers using this Login button as the main way to log in to the Procurify Platform.

Phase 2 - Refinement

WIREFRAMING V2  •  Copywriting  •  SOFT DESIGN  •  USER TESTING

Taking in all feedback

Once we had a good understanding of the tabs and pages that were going to be used within the new mega menu, the copywriter worked on producing title and sub copy for each section of the menu. Meanwhile the wireframe was refined to implement feedback gathered from the previous session.

Key areas that were adjusted due to previous feedback for further testing:

  • Product tab screen was simplified
  • The Company tab was removed from the primary navigation due to the teams previous feedback, for further testing with other internal and external parties to come to a conscious
  • Resources tab was refined further

Internal & External Testing

I then set out to take my learnings from the earlier feedback sessions and after making adjustments to the wireframes, moved through to soft designs. Taking these soft designs through to both an internal and external moderated user testing sessions. During these v2 user testing sessions, I then pulled up the company tab and asked more questions based on company / employer branding web pages to test how the users felt about this information being accessible only via the footer.

I also conducted an unmoderated test with a few other designers on our team, including specific questions about the company tab.

PHASE 2
KEY LEARNINGS

Key things learnt during internal & external user testing

  • Would expect to find Partnerships link within Product tab, or Company tab, not within the Resources tab.
  • Sub-copy for Product Overview and Features feels the same.
  • Users found the the industry tags on the customer stories was helpful, however, needed to be more visible.
  • One user was confused that there was no company tab - “how do I find out about about the company, I always gather information on a company before making a big purchase of a product”.
  • Users liked that there was a review highlight and quick link to review sites.
  • Users liked that the top nav was activated on click, and felt that the arrow makes it more obvious.
  • Menu didn’t feel too overwhelming.
  • Users don’t actively read sub-copy, however, found it informative and clear when they did read it.

Outcome

Results

  • Reduced website bounce rate by 50% over a 10 month period.
  • 23.14% increase in total number of page views across the website compared to the previous year.
  • 41.11% increase in sessions (time users are actively engaged with the website) compared to the previous year.
  • 46.48% increase in visits to the demo page compared to the previous year.
Bounce rate decrease of 50%